Learning Domain: Writing for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Standard: Write routinely over extended time frames (time for reflection and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Writing for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Standard: Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences the claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Writing for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Standard: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Writing for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Standard: Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter: Strong (2)
The subject matter and explanation are clear and organized; however, the information is not sufficient for the topic. A supplement would be necessary for the beginning learner. The object is helpful, and there are several links to peruse for higher level learning.
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching: Strong (2)
There is insufficient support for teachers in the matter of presenting the lesson, but there is a greater support in the areas of activities, worksheets, simulations, and additional links.
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Quality of Assessments: Strong (2)
Various types of assessments are included in this object; some require comprehension and recall and others require reasoning skills and some demonstrations. The activities and worksheets assess major concepts in Genetics through basic and complex models and can be used effectively for collaborative and group works. The object does not offer enough opportunities to demonstrate mastery.
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Quality of Technological Interactivity: Strong (2)
The design of the object does not offer sufficient individualized learning experiences; however, answer keys are provided for most activities and worksheets. The object is interesting and features colors, which encourage usage; its interactive element is limited.
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Quality of Instructional and Practice Exercises: Strong (2)
There are many exercises and activities that are clearly written and supported with accurate answer keys but not enough practices to prove mastery of specific Genetics concepts.
on Mar 27, 02:55am Evaluation
Opportunities for Deeper Learning: Superior (3)
The object provides many opportunities for learners to seek and advance their knowledge and experiences through critical thinking/problem solving, collaborative work, effective communication, constructive arguments/models, and applicable discrete knowledge and skills to real-world situations. There are links and resources to support the development and advancement of the learner's knowledge.