Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Use appropriate deliberative processes in multiple settings.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Apply civic virtues and democratic principles when working with others.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Analyze historical, contemporary, and emerging means of changing societies, promoting the common good, and protecting rights.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Evaluate social and political systems in different contexts, times, and places, that promote civic virtues and enact democratic principles.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Analyze the impact and the appropriate roles of personal interests and perspectives on the application of civic virtues, democratic principles, constitutional rights, and human rights.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Analyze the role of citizens in the U.S. political system, with attention to various theories of democracy, changes in Americans’ participation over time, and alternative models from other
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Analyze the impact of constitutions, laws, treaties, and international agreements on the maintenance of national and international order.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Analyze how people use and challenge local, state, national, and international laws to address a variety of public issues.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Evaluate citizens’ and institutions’ effectiveness in addressing social and political problems at the local, state, tribal, national, and/or international level.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Civics
Standard: Evaluate multiple procedures for making governmental decisions at the local, state, national, and international levels in terms of the civic purposes achieved.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze change and continuity in historical eras.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Explain how the perspectives of people in the present shape interpretations of the past.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze how historical contexts shaped and continue to shape people’s perspectives.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze the ways in which the perspectives of those writing history shaped the history that they produced.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze complex and interacting factors that influenced the perspectives of people during different historical eras.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze how current interpretations of the past are limited by the extent to which available historical sources represent perspectives of people at the time.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Evaluate how historical events and developments were shaped by unique circumstances of time and place as well as broader historical contexts.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Use questions generated about individuals and groups to assess how the significance of their actions changes over time and is shaped by the historical context.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze the relationship between historical sources and the secondary interpretations made from them.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Critique the usefulness of historical sources for a specific historical inquiry based on their maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Use questions generated about multiple historical sources to pursue further inquiry and investigate additional sources.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Detect possible limitations in various kinds of historical evidence and differing secondary interpretations.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Critique the central arguments in secondary works of history on related topics in multiple media in terms of their historical accuracy.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Integrate evidence from multiple relevant historical sources and interpretations into a reasoned argument about the past.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Critique the appropriateness of the historical sources used in a secondary interpretation.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Analyze multiple and complex causes and effects of events in the past.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: History
Standard: Distinguish between long-term causes and triggering events in developing a historical argument.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Evaluating Sources and Using Evidence
Standard: Gather relevant information from multiple sources representing a wide range of views while using the origin, authority, structure, context, and corroborative value of the sources to guide the selection.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Communicating Conclusions & Taking Informed Action
Standard: Critique the use of the reasoning, sequencing, and supporting details of explanations.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Communicating Conclusions & Taking Informed Action
Standard: Construct explanations using sound reasoning, correct sequence (linear or non-linear), examples, and details with significant and pertinent information and data, while acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of the explanation given its purpose (e.g., cause and effect, chronological, procedural, technical).
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Communicating Conclusions & Taking Informed Action
Standard: Critique the use of claims and evidence in arguments for credibility.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Communicating Conclusions & Taking Informed Action
Standard: Use disciplinary and interdisciplinary lenses to understand the characteristics and causes of local, regional, and global problems; instances of such problems in multiple contexts; and challenges and opportunities faced by those trying to address these problems over time and place.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Learning Domain: Communicating Conclusions & Taking Informed Action
Standard: Construct arguments using precise and knowledgeable claims, with evidence from multiple sources, while acknowledging counterclaims and evidentiary weaknesses.
Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)
Comments